Homepage
Login
Profile
BookClubs
dmBox
Read Ebook: The Old Riddle and the Newest Answer by Gerard John
Font size:
Background color:
Text color:
Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page
Ebook has 859 lines and 85927 words, and 18 pages
TO BEGIN AT THE BEGINNING
Certainty that there was a Beginning of the World--What was there before?--The Great Problem, to be answered by Reason and Science 1-3
REASON AND SCIENCE
Principles of Reasoning--Scope and method of Science 4-7
EVOLUTION
Term variously used for a Process and a Principle. We commence with the latter 8-9
"THE LAW OF EVOLUTION"
Evolution as a Philosophy--Main features of the system 10-14
WHAT IS A "LAW OF NATURE"?
Erroneous use of the term frequent: its scientific use 15-19
"THE LAW OF SUBSTANCE"
A combination of two other "Laws," viz.--The indestructibility of Matter, and the Conservation of Energy--But there is also Dissipation of Energy--Consequences inferred from this as to the Duration of the Universe 20-28
"THE SEVEN ENIGMAS"
The "Law of Continuity"--Alleged breaches--Seven evolutionary stages deduced to be scientifically unexplained, or even inexplicable 29-34
MATTER AND MOTION
Constitution and Properties of Matter inconsistent with Haeckel's evolutionary system--Also the Laws of Motion--Radium and its revelations 35-44
THE PROBLEM OF LIFE
Evolution here considered as a process--In its larger sense, postulates spontaneous generation--which, however, Science disallows--Protoplasm and Crystallization 45-66
ANIMAL AND MAN
Origin of simple sensation and consciousness even less explicable than that of life--Gulf between man and the lower animals--Language exclusively human--The significance of Free-will can be impugned only by the absurdity of denying its existence 67-85
THE ORDER OF NATURE
PURPOSE AND CHANCE
What "Chance" means--It is the sole alternative to Purpose or Design--Arguments against Purposive Creation--The Existence of Pain--The Mysteries of Generation 110-125
MONISM
The Monistic Philosophy--Its utter lack of a scientific basis--Contradicted by the ideas of morality and truth--Not really adopted by Monists themselves 126-139
ORGANIC EVOLUTION
"Evolution" now to be considered in its most restricted signification--Organic Evolution, or "Transformism," not identical with Darwinism--The nature of the questions before us 140-148
DARWINISM
Though no essential part of our enquiry, Darwinism must be studied on account of importance ascribed to it--Baseless claims on its behalf--True character of the system--Natural Selection and its mode of action--Phenomena which seem to favour Darwinism--Difficulties on the other side--Limits of Variation--Specific stability--Adverse probabilities--Natural selection can produce nothing--Transitional developments useless or harmful--Artistic ornaments unexplained--Flaws in argument--Organic progress--Rudimentary Organs--Embryology--Scientific opinion as to Darwinism 149-203
THE FACTS OF EVOLUTION
Palaeontology furnishes the only sound basis for argument--The nature of the evidence required--The history of Life as known to us is inconsistent with evolutionary theories--Haeckel's "ante-periods"--Conclusion to which facts point 204-238
"AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM"
Arguments on behalf of Evolution--The genealogy of the Horse--Haeckel's Pedigree of Man--Darwin's plea of imperfection of the geological record--No evolutionary process is yet demonstrated; Still less has anything been done to establish Evolution as a creative force 239-269
TO SUM UP
Reason leads to conclusions which physical science cannot reach--The recognition of a First Cause beyond the Sensible Universe an intellectual necessity--Knowledge of this cause attainable by reason--Conclusion 270-280
APPENDICES
A. Recent Scientific Verdicts concerning Darwinism and Transformism 281
C. The Course of Evolution 285
D. The pedigree of the Horse: further evidence 286
INDEX 289
FOOTNOTES
TO BEGIN AT THE BEGINNING
That the world as we know it had a beginning is a truth which there is no denying. Not only have philosophers always argued that it must be so: the researches of physical science assure us that it has been so in fact. Astronomy, says Professor Huxley, "leads us to contemplate phenomena the very nature of which demonstrates that they must have had a beginning." The hypothesis that phenomena of Nature similar to those exhibited by the present world have always existed, the same authority assures us, "is absolutely incompatible with such evidence as we have, which is of so plain and so simple a character that it is impossible in any way to escape from the conclusions which it forces upon us." This conclusion, physicists tell us, is inevitable when we study the laws by which the operations of Nature are governed, and as Professor Balfour Stewart writes, we thus become "absolutely certain" that these operations cannot have existed for ever, and that a time will come when they must cease. In like manner, a recent and competent witness to the conclusions of contemporary Science, lays down, as one of the truths which her latest discoveries compel us to accept, that the world is not eternal, that the earth is cooling from a state of heat rendering life impossible, to one of physical exhaustion equally fatal to it. Accordingly "Life must have had a beginning and must come to an end,"--and our whole Solar System must similarly have had a commencement, at a period not infinitely remote.
We are therefore compelled by common-sense to ask when we consider Nature, What is the force or power at the back of her, which first set her going, and whence she draws the capability of performing the operations which we find her performing every day; that force or power which must be the ultimate origin of everything that is in the world? This is the great fundamental problem which the student of Nature has to face, and beside it all others fade into insignificance. It is with this that we are now engaged. We have to ask how our reason bids us answer it, and the first question which arises naturally is, What light is thrown on the subject by modern Science, of whose achievements we are all so justly proud?
REASON AND SCIENCE
In studying a question such as this, we must commence by being determined, on the one hand to accept nothing as true but what our reason warrants us in believing, and on the other hand to follow the guidance of reason as far as, rightly used, it will lead us. The principle formulated by Professor Huxley, as the foundation-stone of what he termed "Agnosticism," is that which must needs be adopted, and as a matter of fact has ever been adopted, by rational men.
Positively--in matters of the intellect follow your reason as far as it will take you, without regard to any other consideration. And negatively--in matters of the intellect do not pretend that conclusions are certain which are not demonstrated or demonstrable.
There can be no sort of question that so long as men of science really act thus, and confine themselves to the treatment of matters in regard of which they can claim special knowledge, common sense bids us listen to them with respect, and even with submission. But the same common sense requires that we should satisfy ourselves that they truly deserve the character assigned them, and pretend to no knowledge on the score of Science but what their scientific methods are competent to acquire. When they step beyond this their own proper domain, whatever weight may be given to their opinions upon other grounds, they cease to speak in the name of Science.
What then, we must ask, is the province of Science, and what are her methods?
"Science," always understanding by the term physical or experimental Science, deals with the universe so far as it is known to us through our senses. The universe known thus we call "Nature," and the whole stock in trade of Science is the examination and verification of natural phenomena, with such inferences therefrom as ascertained facts legitimately suggest. From careful and trustworthy observation she can learn what are called the "Laws of Nature," that is to say the manner in which the various elements and forces of the universe are found constantly to act, in given circumstances; she can, to some extent, discover the chain of causes and effects, or more properly of conditions and consequences, through which natural operations are carried on. She can even construct hypotheses as to what she cannot directly observe, namely, the nature of substances and forces; and such hypotheses are justified in proportion as they are found to tally with facts. If constantly thus justified, they are styled theories, and come to be practically assumed as established truths. But it must ever be remembered that Science can take no step in advance which is not based on fact, and that when facts are not forthcoming for its support an hypothesis or a theory has no scientific value.
Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page