Homepage
Login
Profile
BookClubs
dmBox
Read Ebook: Trial of John Jasper lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent for the murder of Edwin Drood engineer by Dickens Fellowship London England Chesterton G K Gilbert Keith Other Ley J W T James William Thomas Other
Font size:
Background color:
Text color:
Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page Prev Page
Ebook has 1437 lines and 26560 words, and 29 pages
MR. CROTCH: Well, now, Mr. Durdles, I will ask you another question. As a matter of fact, have you not on many occasions chased little boys and others out of the crypt?
WITNESS: Yes, and they've chased me.
MR. CROTCH: Where did these boys find their way into the crypt?
WITNESS: Ay?
MR. CROTCH: You don't know?
WITNESS: No, I don't.
MR. CROTCH: You swear you don't know?
WITNESS: Ay, I swear I don't know.
MR. CROTCH: You have never seen them creeping through the windows of the crypt?
WITNESS: Might be; when I've been sober.
MR. CROTCH: That'll do. Now, you tell us that you met Mr. Datchery. Is that so?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CROTCH: Have you ever admitted Mr. Datchery to the Sapsea vault?
MR. WALTERS: This is going far beyond--
MR. CHESTERTON: If my learned friend will look at the first paragraph he will see that in cross-examination the formal witnesses may, in response to specific questions, give explanations not expressly contained in the book.
MR. WALTERS: Then I must re-examine the witness.
MR. CHESTERTON: Certainly.
MR. CROTCH: Now, Mr. Durdles, have you ever admitted Mr. Datchery to the Sapsea vault?
WITNESS: Not that I can remember.
MR. CROTCH: If you cannot remember admitting Datchery, do you at any time remember admitting anybody else?
WITNESS: No; I can't say as I do.
MR. CROTCH: Thank you, Mr. Durdles.
MR. WALTERS: I won't trouble you to re-examine you, Mr. Durdles.
WITNESS: Well, good day. I'll drink your health on the way home, and I won't go home till morning--I beg your pardon, my Lord.
MR. WALTERS: The Reverend Canon Crisparkle.
USHER: Reverend Canon Crisparkle.
THE FOREMAN: May I interpose for a moment? This gentleman has been called as the Reverend Septimus Crisparkle. I submit to your Lordship that his real name is Christopher Nubbles, a man who was tried before you on the information of a certain Mr. Chuckster, on the charge of being a snob, and you, in one of those summings-up which have made your name famous wherever the English language is spoken, found that the charge brought by Mr. Chuckster was well and truly proved. Now, I contend that Mr. Christopher Nubbles has gone to Cloisterham, become a Minor Canon, taken the name of Crisparkle, and is here obviously a more intolerable snob than ever.
MR. WALTERS: Mr. Crisparkle; I believe you are a Minor Canon of Cloisterham Cathedral?
WITNESS: I am, sir.
MR. WALTERS: I believe your identity has never been disputed until this moment?
WITNESS: Never. I am glad to be able to answer that impertinent reflection.
MR. WALTERS: Do you happen to know John Jasper?
WITNESS: Very well. He was associated with me daily in the duties of the Cathedral.
MR. WALTERS: Did he ever tell you about his affection for his nephew, Edwin Drood?
WITNESS: Constantly.
MR. WALTERS: And did he, while in this confidential mood, also tell you of his great affection for Miss Rosa Bud?
WITNESS: No, I cannot charge my memory that he ever mentioned affection for her.
MR. WALTERS: Well, then, in that matter John Jasper deceived you?
WITNESS: Well, shall we say deceived? Guilty of a lapse of confidence to a priest. Theologically speaking it would be deceit, perhaps.
MR. WALTERS: I believe, Mr. Crisparkle, that you have been acting as tutor to Neville Landless?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: Do you mind telling the court the opinion you formed of that man's character?
WITNESS: I should say a very impulsive man, but responsive to influence of any kind.
MR. WALTERS: I think he has a sister?
WITNESS: Oh, yes: Miss Helena Landless.
MR. WALTERS: Is he under her influence at all?
WITNESS: Yes, I should say she exercises a good and strong influence upon him.
JUDGE: I should suggest that question is very improper. We are all under the influence of each other to a great extent. I am as much under the influence of the foreman of the Jury that I almost entirely agree with the view that he takes of the situation when he mentions it. But I think it is not quite proper to say "Is he under the influence of his sister?" Surely?
MR. WALTERS: But, my Lord, this gentleman knows both parties, and is perfectly acquainted with their relationships.
WITNESS: Yes, well.
MR. WALTERS: I will not press the point. I will ask you, Mr. Crisparkle, have you any influence?
Add to tbrJar First Page Next Page Prev Page